You are here: Manchester Confidential › Culture › Architecture.

Category: Good
What?
The Square with No Name?
Right you are. Where is ‘The Square with No Name’?
Don’t know. You can’t find it on any map.
Ha, ha, indeed
Funny that, don’t you think? Anyway it’s where Bridge Street, King Street West and St. Mary's Parsonage come together under the Inland Revenue Building and just next to the Masonic Hall. The fourth side of the square is Motor Street and is about twenty metres long.
Masonic Hall? Was the square created by men with one trouser leg rolled up and careers in the Police?
No, I guess it was created by men with clip-boards in the Planning Department. By accident – I reckon. This is all guesswork as I can’t find any mention of the square in Central Library. Then again not having a name makes it a bit difficult to look up.
When was the Square with No Name created?
Sometime in the fifties. It’s probably a shaven off remnant of the Manchester Plan of 1945. There was WWII bomb damage in this area but it doesn’t seem to have affected the site of the future Square with No Name.
What was the Manchester Plan of 1945?
It was a wholescale re-imagining of the city centre and suburbs: tatty Victorian buildings would go (just a few would be spared – although not the Town Hall), replaced by boulevards and sleek modern buildings. Manchester would bow down to the Age of the Car.
Even the Town Hall might have gone?
Yes. Let me explain. Broken as a superpower Britain found it hard to face its past. A dirty, bombed, Manchester being the first urban centre of the Industrial Revolution was one of the worst for avoiding a glance in the mirror. It was probably too painful, the future was clearly going to be more uncertain and of less global significance. Better then to wipe all that away, get rid of the old stuff, with its dodgy politics and Imperialism. Make a fresh start. There is something superb about the optimism of the Manchester Plan but if carried through we would have been left with a Stalinist city centre like Nova Huta close to Cracow. In fact it’s only superb because it failed, the vision is thrilling, the reality, apart from one or two ideas, would have been horrific. Instead of the glorious mess of Manchester architecture we would have been left with a regimented and uniform streetscene.
Nova Huta Poland. Manchester could have been like this
What’s this got to do with the Square with No Name again?
The area here was supposed to be completely cleared. Salford Central Station just over the river from the Square with No Name was going to be a massive transport interchange. The area would have been filled with new buildings leading down to the River Irwell which was to be culvetted and disappeared under a dual carriageway. The river was still smelly with industry so it seemed like a grand idea – hide it rather than clean it. On the picture below, Bridge Street is on the extreme left, with the Irwell carriageway curving round the lower middle foreground. You can spot buildings which would have been 'spared' such as John Rylands Library and Sunlight House. Anyway back to the Square with No Name: it may have had a title at one time.
What was that?
Albert Place. This was the last part of Bridge Street before the bridge to Salford which is called Albert Bridge. But that doesn’t seem to have matched the site of the Square with No Name exactly. In one of the old photographs you can see some of the businesses and buildings that went post-war: Grundy’s Rubber Products, The Old Curiosity Shop, a School of Antiques. Odd sounding business that last one. A famous shop did open here in the sixties when the Square with No Name was in existence. That was Edwardia.
And why was Edwardia famous?
It was bi-partisan, it crossed the dividing line, it was the clothes emporium of two football fops: Mike Summerbee of Manchester City and George Best of Manchester United. You can see it pictured here, with Regina, the womenswear bit. Edwardia is now Starbucks, with Mojo above. Bestie probably would have preferred the club round the corner where the Purple Pussycat Bar is than sitting around with a tall mocha and extra cream. There have been nick-names for the area.
Go on?
With the down draught produced by the splendid Albert Bridge House by EH Banks from 1959, it was christened ‘Windy Corner’. Duncan Measor in his classic gazetteer of the late eighties, Twin Cities, described the place as the ‘great skirt-lifter, hat-remover and umbrella-destroyer’. During the 'swinging sixties' the wider area was known as 'the Village'. A tad different in character from today's more famous Village though.
Should the Square with No Name be named?
Maybe. We could have a competition to give the place a proper title. Since it’s so close to the soon to re-open People’s History Museum, we could mark Manchester's radical movements. Radical Square anyone? Union Square? Liberty Square?
Like what you see? Enter your email to sign up for our newsletters which are chock-a-block with more great videos, food reviews, news, deals and savings.
32 comments so far, continue the conversation, write a comment.
I like the way that sculpture in Manchester Town Hall celebrates people who really achieved…
Read moreThis is a fascinating story, and I would very much like to get involved. My Master's dissertation at…
Read moreCheeky bugger Tom. You put a link to your story on Confidential but no link to us on yours....
Read moreI really like the Ancient Egyptian columns by Salford station and the hypostyle hall of columns…
Read more

Circle Square !
Noticed on recent trip to Paris that les francais rename their streets at the drop of a hat after recent presidents....how about Blair Square !
Wilson Square would be good. But wouldn't it be more fitting to incorporate a Wilson Square in the (presumably) to-be-redeveloped site that the BBC on Oxford Road will leave behind after the relocation?
Wilson Square for me!
Heard a romour that the Freemasons is up for sale, and someone had applied to drop it and build apartments. Its been put on hold 'cos of the credit crunch, but i guess wil be back on the cards when things pick up. An impressive building on the inside, Portland stone on the outside, bloody scandalous!
It' the Freemasons Hall incidentally at 38 Bridge Street. I'm popping in to see it room hire arrangements
Ozzydog, there's already an Irwell Place in the area. Agree with Michael West's suggestion,Parsonage Sq, or as it adjacent to Albert Bridge House, the area could be called..ALBERT PLACE.
How about Parsonage Square? We've got Parsonage Gardens nearby.
Extortion experts? Oh it's easy to mock the good men and women of HMRC but when you want money for a school or a hospital...sorry, you mean Starbucks don't you? Good point.Pigeon Square.
Extortion Square, after all is is next to the biggest extortion experts in the land.
George Best Square?Mike Summerbee Square?
George Best Square?Mike Summerbee Square?
I dont think you have actually read the 1945 Manchester Plan. There are 6 copies in the reference library. Written by Sharp and the 6 other guys who weren't fit enough to go to war.Hand drawn maps.Beautiful illustrations.Picked out by the great "urbanist",Mumford for being"organic";not adopting the Haussman inspired wholesale demolition used to create grand gestures like the Champs Elysee.The opposite of everything you say. Dont believe me?- go to the library and read it.
I love how this article spirals off from being about some random open area of town that I've never given any thought to, nor even considered as a 'square', to give a brilliant overview of the 1945 plan and some much-needed insight into the what state of the city was aftet the war, and how the public and planners saw it at that time, that led to such bonkers rebuilding concepts.Great stuff Jonathon!
What about Curiosity Square - it's mentioned in the article as being one of the old shops there abouts and it's certainly causing a lot of curiosity amongst the Confidential readers ....
Just William, there was much of merit in the 1945 Plan but there was also much to terrify. It is beautifully presented and it is impressive, the best of it being the plan for a concert hall/cultural centre in All Saints. But it would have - in the city centre at least, it was more humane in the suburbs - have destroyed far more than it would have created. It was also responsible for the way the University became isolated behind big, very strange, non-parks, literally turned into an ivory tower. This was because it was filled with that notion of cities being separated into tidy areas of clearly defined function. All the cities I've enjoyed best have been a bedlam of function and activity. The Manchester Plan would have given us Haussman-like boulevards and worse it would have tried to force the city to match notions on paper: real cities break out in odd ways, are uncontrollable. Even when they are dreamt up concepts such as Washington they develop in different ways than envisaged. The whole Plan whilst being admirable and thoughtful, has a whiff of the arrogance of the Modernists, a sort of Spock-like coldness. It seems to say: "We know best and you should follow what we say because it would be illogical to do otherwise." The money was never there to realise the Plan of course, so in a way we can't tell can we...but if you look at cities which went further than Manchester they can make you shudder? Having said that it is a very important document.
Vicarinatutu each to their own eh? Funnily enough anything we do on architecture or city planning gets thousands of reads. People are interested in their city and the way its developed and developing. Food, drink, buildings, news, satire....we're a broad church dear Reverend. Pray where you will. You're always welcome.
Vicar, i dont agree. I think this is a great article - intersting and well researched. Sometimes I lose faith in this site, especially when it bangs on about chorlton and its media types , independant bars etc. This article reminds me of why i come back to the site.
If it's going to be named, use one of the old names - Albert Place, Windy Corner or Village Place - keep reference to the previous use of the area. Or refer to the clearance plan. Generic names such as Liberty Square are just dull.
has anyone published a book on the 1945 scheme? Unless I'm getting my wires crossed, I believe several UK cities had similar bulldozing-into-the-future schemes developed, though none of them happened (unless this is when Glasgow got a motorway through it?). If there isn't a book, perhaps there could be one..?
hmmmmm, you really haven't got anything to do have you Schofield.
I like that picture from the 1945 plan. I like Nova Huta. Is there still time to instigate the plan?
Windy Corner II = the junction of Liverpool Road & Deansgate by the Hilton.
Windy Corner II = the junction of Liverpool Road & Deansgate by the Hilton.
In my youth, some not inconsiderable time ago we referred to it as "The Village", the main attraction being "Blinkers" disco - a wonderful night out, frequented by George Best and others including musicians and radio DJs of the day. Still got the membership card! Sad?
We call it Mojo square
If it was called that Burt, then it isn't on the maps and it isn't signed as such in the square.
I always thought it was called Motor Street Square...which is very rock n roll (Mojo overlooking helps). A Chinese Whisper than I took to be gospel.
What about Irwell Square or Place?It is geographically correct and not too fancy or twee.
Why not call it 'George Best Square' and allow Manchester's street drinkers to gather there in the great man's name?
Call it Wilson square in memory of the good man. He had a lot of wind and would probably approve of the music coming out of Mojo.
It obviously has no name because it is part of Manchester's "Masonic Quarter" with the Hall and the Blackfriars Bridge etc.