- Park Inn Manchester, Victoria
Have your Christmas celebration at the Park Inn fr... - Cheshire Oaks Designer Outlet
Find out more about Cheshire Oaks here - Harvey Nichols
Harvey Nichols Supper Club: Three Course dinner an... - Riverford Organic Veg
The Travelling Field Kitchen at Stockley Farm - Band on the wall
Book a £10 meal deal and get FREE concert tickets - Cocktail Master Class - Strictly
Cocktail masterclasses at City Inn's Blue Bar - bo... - Planet Code
Let PlanetCode.co.uk review your company website - Stock
Book now for new Opera night at Stock - Electrik
Any cocktail, main course and pudding for just £10 - Black Dog Ballroom
Save 30% on food and drinks at Black Dog Ballroom ...
You are here: Home › News › General
The Castlefield Debate – a result
Castlefield controlling and directing body to be set up as a result of Wednesday’s Confidential debate
Date Published: 02/08/2007
|
Debates are usually just chat: useful and diverting maybe but often not leading anywhere. Manchester Confidential’s Future of Castlefield debate in Dukes 92 was different. There was energy, fierce opinion and commitment to push forward change in this vital city area. There was a result too – more of that later.
The panel were Cllr Pat Karney who has responsibility for the city centre, Sharon Barnes of Castlefield estates which owns Dukes 92, Eastgate and much else in the area, Gordon Reid of City Co, the city centre management company, Jon Grieves of Choice Bar and Restaurant and Phil Griffin, writer and broadcaster, who’s article on Manchester Confidential lit this particular bonfire. All spoke with passion about this very special area. Castlefield’s historical significance is almost unparalleled: it’s the place where Manchester was born in AD79 but more importantly where the oldest passenger railway station in the world lies adjacent to the first industrial canal of the modern age. It’s one of those few places where you can say with confidence that the world changed here. It also provides Manchester with an opportunity to give itself a spectacular central amenity of gardens, festivals, museums and other attractions. The shame at present is that the area is failing to measure up to both the heritage and the potential. Phil Griffin talked about the need to reintroduce Castlefield to the city centre, to not build anything else around the canal basin, to focus on the waterfront and to grow the unique atmosphere of the area. Cllr Karney deplored the private ownership in the area, asked Peel Holdings to donate a presently boarded up parcel of land to the community as gardens, and underlined the need for residents and council to work together. |
![]() Sharon Barnes had a clear series of proposals from signs into the area, the re-naming of G-Mex station on the Metrolink as Castlefield, better lighting, improved paving, new buildings to be the right scale and set well back from the water’s edge, a full programme of events not revolving around alcohol and the construction of a children’s play area in the Roman fort area. Jon Grieves made similar points also emphasising the need for family based activities, festivals and markets but not only in the summer months also in winter. Ground floor usage of interesting shops and restaurants should be encouraged to give life to the area as well. Gordon Reid also wanted more independent businesses in Castlefield and for the area to be fully integrated into the city centre. All the panellists called for a body to be set up in Castlefield to coordinate policy with regard to the future, to make proposals and carry them through. There is no doubt that this will now happen, the Manchester Confidential Future of Castlefield debate will deliver an organising body for the area. Castlefield will have its partnership just as Piccadilly has, of council, residents, businesses and developers. It will instigate change for the better. Castlefield cannot be allowed to slide anymore. As Sharon Barnes said the city has to recognise and understand the ‘gift’ they have inherited. We all do in Manchester. Castlefield should be the automatic choice for residents and tourists when they want a traffic free stroll complete with stirring civil engineering and architecture, beautiful gardens, a great play area and interesting entertainment. That it is not is, in civic terms, a tragedy and shame. Over the next weeks interested parties will come together and formally set up the Castlefield body. This will not be a talking shop. As with the debate last night it should deliver results. It simply has to. There will be more about the debate in Sleuth tomorrow. What is your vision for Castlefield? Let us know below. |
Anonymous says.." and the centrepoint of dpercussion was . . . bring back peter saville"
|
Anonymous says.." I think that the cobbles are great - give it an authentic feel - but they pose a problem for girls in high heels - reducing traffic in off the locks"
|
cllr.pat karney says.." Sorry --spelt Jon like my brother John.Apols. "
|
mark says.." well done to cllr Pat K. I was pleasantly surprised to hear a local cllr who didn't seem to talk bull**** and wants to get something done."
|
Anonymous says.." jacksonswharf.co.uk"
|
Anonymous says.." Get involved in the redevelopment plans process for the future phases of the Potato Wharf site, see www.potatowharfconsultation.co.uk for further details."
|
Anonymous says.." How is the Castlefield Partnership coming along ManCon???"
|




























